Summary of the Bill
The bill aims to eliminate per-country visa limits, which are currently causing severe backlogs in green card. As of right now, the Immigration and Nationality Act allows for only 140,000 employment-based visas to be allocated each year. At present, the percentage of visas that can be allocated to any one country is capped at 7% percent of all of the employment-based visas available.
Under the Fairness for High-Skilled
Immigrants Act, the per-country limit on employment-based visas would
be eliminated by 2015 after a 3 year phase-in period (FY 2012, FY 2013 and FY 2014). During the 3 year
transition, the vast majority of Employment Based visas would be
allocated on first-in-first out basis in order to eliminate the current
backlogs.
As pointed by one of our reader, an amendment presented by Rep Lofgren to this bill was approved by the committee. As per the amendment, final rules as followed will beapplied to EB2 and EB3 category only. No change in rule is expected for EB1, EB4 and EB5.
In FY 2012, backlogged pending cases irrespective of country with earlier priority date would receive unreserved visas - 85% of the visa allocation within a category with respect to . In FY 2013 and FY 2014 they would receive 90% of the visa allocations within a category. There is a limit of 25% for reserved visas and 85 % for unreserved visas that could be made available for a single country under this bill. Reserved visas will be only available until FY 2014 (and in general will be used by ROW-M-P based on current backlog). After FY 2014, all visas (there will be no reserved or unreserved visas) within a category will be used strictly for backlog reduction solely based on first-in-first out (FIFO) regardless of country of birth. Please note that there is no change in spillover rules, unused visas will be allocated regardless of country strictly based on priority date from one category to other category during later quarter in a fiscal year.
Regardless of these updates estimation do not change, as at no point any country for first three phase in period will use more than 85% of the limit.
In FY 2012, backlogged pending cases irrespective of country with earlier priority date would receive unreserved visas - 85% of the visa allocation within a category with respect to . In FY 2013 and FY 2014 they would receive 90% of the visa allocations within a category. There is a limit of 25% for reserved visas and 85 % for unreserved visas that could be made available for a single country under this bill. Reserved visas will be only available until FY 2014 (and in general will be used by ROW-M-P based on current backlog). After FY 2014, all visas (there will be no reserved or unreserved visas) within a category will be used strictly for backlog reduction solely based on first-in-first out (FIFO) regardless of country of birth. Please note that there is no change in spillover rules, unused visas will be allocated regardless of country strictly based on priority date from one category to other category during later quarter in a fiscal year.
Regardless of these updates estimation do not change, as at no point any country for first three phase in period will use more than 85% of the limit.
Estimation of cut-off dates movement each year if HR 3012 becomes a law
We have summarized the estimation of cut-off date movements for EB category if HR 3012 will become a law effective 30 September 2011. In general, EB2 category will be backlogged for 3-4 years whereas EB3 category will be backlogged for 8-9 years. During estimation of such cut-off dates, it was assumed that EB2 category will not receive more than 15000 spillovers or unused visa. 15000 seems like far optimized estimation after considering that with this new bill, EB2 backlogged countries would receive spillover from EB1, EB4 and EB5 (not EB2-ROW as allocation are very less). With time and current backlog, we expect EB5 at best would yield 5000 and EB1 only 10,000.
It is also assumed that EB2 category will not be current for quite some time as EB2-ROW will be backlogged until 2015 and new EB2-IC demand will always be replenishing inventory. That said, EB3 will not receive any spillover anytime soon. This is an assumption and reality may be different. EB1 category is always assumed current for sake of simplicity in calculations.
| Generally Reserved will be used by ROW-M-P; Unreserved will be used by I-C for initial years |
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/112hr3012.pdf
Read the last section of the bill regarding numbers.
I am not sure this is correct. It's the 15%/10%/10% that are "reserved" for all but I and C. The rest are "unreserved," and so while I and C can and will get from the 85%/90%/90% pool, so can ROW. Furthermore, I is effectively capped at 70% = 28,000. So effectively, ROW and C will be sharing 12k visas per year for 3 years. At least, I think this is how it will work.
Read this. The amendment replaces the entire subsection (e) . But the amendment does not talk about 70% limit.
This was true for EB2-India as whenever demand for them was greater than 28000 (while I was using 70%), EB2 -C was far above 6000 for that PD. So assuming FIFO and available unreserved visas and 85% limit, these assumptions still hold. Even after that 15000 spillover is available, those movement will still be same for those countries.
Even for EB3-I for first year they including EB3-C is using around 36000 visas. My personal belief is that EB3-C demand in I-485 inventory is not real representative of real NVC demand. EB3-C demand from few months or last year has used around 50% CP demand. It is so complicated with respect to EB3-C that Mr. Oppenheim himself is never able to give any real estimate of its movement. EB3-C category is real menace and should not be over looked. I feel my assumption of 15% CP demand for this category is far underestimated.
Other difficult category is EB3-ROW but I will talk more about it in reply to "backlogged".
This bill aims to reduce backlog by removing country cap limit but not changing annual limit of 140K visas for EB category. It is just that visas will be removed from 182 different buckets and moved into one bucket to use them for approval strictly based on old PD.
On that note, this does not mean in few years from now DOS/USCIS will not plan to move dates more abruptly for EB3 category post July 2007 to intake new demand and then retrogress it. This estimation is only when can really expect you to receive GC.
Your understanding about how the bill will work is correct and hence if you will see FY 2013 estimation for EB3, both reserved and unreserved category share same PD.
Apart from EB3-C having high CP demand, EB3-ROW has huge number of hidden demand plus 15% CP demand which never makes to I-485 inventory.
Simple example of this can be seen here - http://us-non-immigrants.blogspot.com/2011/08/eb3-row-fy-2011-estimation-of-visa.html
EB3-ROW from time to time see atleast 60-70% demand that is always added to the inventory once dates become current. Last year EB3-ROW inventory only reduced by 13000 even 29800 is available. 7000 visas were later added to the inventory.
So this whole movement is not as simple as using I-485 inventory to estimate movement. I do not claim that I know everything but given estimation is far more optimized. Once EB3 PD will cross December 2004 (since EB3-I CP demand is just 5%), EB3-C-ROW-M-P will slow down movement considerably due to high variable demand inventory to inventory.
In general, I would not even bother about 85% limit (as this limit for a single country will never be reached unless it is the only one which is backlogged) and just use 36000 + 15000 (spillover) = 51000 (49000 for FY 2012) to estimate where dates will move each year. Even if EB2-I will use more or less than maximum visa, PD for category will have to be same.
Simple calculations for EB2-IC tells that there are 192k - 10K ROW from inventory = 182K cases until Q2 FY 2011 (that is until where data is analyzed in above table). Apart from that Q3 FY 2011 PERM have 8200 EB2-IC approvals (http://us-non-immigrants.blogspot.com/2011/08/perm-approvals-processing-time-q3-fy.html)
So 182K + 8200*2.25 = 200450 EB2-IC cases until FY 2011 Q3.
So assuming 51K visas for EB2-IC every years, it will atleast take 200450/51000 = 3.9 years to complete this backlog and get EB2-IC current too Q3 level. This is simple calculations and is depicted in above estimation when Feb 12 will get GC in FY 2015.
*Please note above estimation is only to receive GC and dates may become current earlier and retrogress so that DOS can intake demand.
After passing the law you mentioned,
Is there any possibility for nurses to be in skilled worker category ?
As ,we were in skilled worker before retrogression.
How sad it is for long waiting we have had in last 6 years .
Also, for pre-July 2007, wouldn't most of the only hidden demand already be factored in by now in the demand data, since CIS has instructed local offices to send all pre-adjudicated I485s to service centers and the consular outposts are quite good at reporting applications?
Sorry for the questions. Just trying to figure this whole thing out, and I really appreciate all your efforts.
Regarding your other question about not using demand data, I will reply later in the evening.
Adding two tables and assuming some consular processing demand, you will get above comprehensive table.
Imagine If you were standing in the grocery line to buy milk and the person on the counter said you cannot buy milk because 5 people from your country have already bought milk and then person on the counter sells milk to people of other countries that were behind you in the line…. Will that be fair to you?
Here is what you mentioned in your post about November VB.
•People who missed boat in 2007 from PD 15 April 2007 = 2865
•Carry over PWMB from FY 2011 that will be "doc qual" = 350
•Visible Demand from PD 15 April 2007 - July 2007 = 8000
Can this nos. be verified with the latest 485 inventory report? I dont see 8000 pending applications for the period 15th April-July 2007. Do you think there will be more applications coming? I know inventory report does not take into account CP demand. But I am assuming it is very less for India.
Also do you think there is a need to recalculate PWMB nos based on this inventory report?
Thanks in advance for your inputs.
When do you think i will be able to apply 484?
Also apart from the inventory, I am also considering People who missed the boat during July 2007 for EB3 ROW M P I C. There are around 13000 cases including dependents that missed such opportunity. earlier hidden demand was assumed to be from LO but now inventory also report cases from field offices but still such demand would show up every time. From past few months EB3 ROWMP is just using 1400-1600 visas from inventory even though 2950 is available for them together every month. This tells you that at least 50% is hidden or CP demand which comes once cases get current.
So in all this whole thing gets complicated but I have found using inventory and CP factor has made my data and calculation more close to reality. But this does not mean you can't figure out same thing using just demand data and your own favors. There is nothing holy about what you do. It Ishtar matter of comfort , precision and accuracy that I received with this method.
At one time USCIS was thinking about allowing pre-registration of i485 but I am not sure where are they with this yet.
Why there should be seperate queue for each country. The FIFO arrangement is fair. Every non american who wants a green card gets in the queue and get it when his or her turn comes.
I'm surprised by the comment by Mark. Why the heck he or she needs a special treatment.
If you will see first table derived from current inventory,until 2007 there are 9556 pending I-485 which include these 8000 and few porting demand. Some PWMB from May_ June VB may have made into this inventory. PWMB from July VB date is not expected to be in this inventory. Other than this PWMB after 15 th April 2007 will not make into inventory until next released report as these were filed after 01 October 2011.
As I have said before maybe here or in another forum, We'll just have to wait and see if this bill will pass into law and if it does, then We (R M and P) have to accept it and weep while our friends in I and C celebrate. Or if it does not .....back to business as usual.
11/01/2011: The Rank of H.R. 3012 Bill Soared to Number One of the Weekly Top Five Pending Legislative Bills in the Legislative Bill Report Site
In the Legislative Information Site of the Library of Congress, Thomas, this bill has moved up from the second most hit bills to number one most hit bill this week reflecting the attention this bill has been receiving from the employment-based immigrants, businesses, and for that matter, the opponents of the bill. Despite the popularity of this bill, this bill is not in this week's House floor schedule at this time. The schedule can change before the end of the week, though. It depends on the House Majority Leader's scheduling from the House calendar.
11/01/2011: Congressman Rush Holt (D) Joins Sponsorship of H.R. 3012
Yesterday, the Democratic Congressman, Rush Holt from New Jersey joined the sponsorship of this bill making this bill more "bi-partisan" legislative bill. Accordingly, the number of co-sponsors for this bill have increased to four, including the powerful Democratic immigration legislation leader in the House, Zoe Lofgren from California.
Boy, this bill is receiving such a large scale attention, and now another member joins in the bipartisan effort. The grassroots movement has become only stronger since the bill passed the markup in the judiciary committee.
There has never been so much push and optimism towards any immigration bill in the last 4 years. Also, due to its noncontroversial nature, this bill stands a very large probability of passing the ranks of bipartisan support.
We are converging to a point, where failure of this bill to become law may be such a big disappointment and hard pill to swallow after all these efforts and momentum that I doubt another such monumental effort can arise in near future. It literally looks *now or never*. I sincerely hope it is taken up for a vote on the house floor as soon as possible. Time is very critical - the sooner the bill continues clearing each hurdle, the more the momentum can be sustained.
The filter, to know which counter to fall in line to, is the number of items a grocer has in his basket or cart which is analogous to that of a citizen of say country XYZ (the customer) with the number of its citizens who wants to migrate to US (the items in his basket or cart).
Thanks
Let me ask you this would it be fair to you if a person from your country in the same EB category as you who had a PD later then your PD got his green Card before you?
No, people in the other counter should not Say it’s Okay because that will not be fair. If the other lanes have to be closed then the people in the other lanes should be placed in counter A and B in front of the people already in line A and B if they went to their line (other lines beside A& B) before them (FIFO). The reason I believe that is fair is because no one knew what line could be closed when.. Wouldn’t you agree if you were in another line and stood in that line before a person in line A and B stood in line and suddenly your counter was closed wouldn’t you liked to be placed in front of that person that came and stood in Line A after you?
No, people in the other counter should not Say it’s Okay because that will not be fair. If the other lanes have to be closed then the people in the other lanes should be placed in counter A and B in front of the people already in line A and B if they went to their line (other lines beside A& B) before them (FIFO). The reason I believe that is fair is because no one knew what line could be closed when.. Wouldn’t you agree if you were in another line and stood in that line before a person in line A and B stood in line and suddenly your counter was closed wouldn’t you liked to be placed in front of that person that came and stood in Line A after you?
Is my understanding correct ?
Thanks for the info.
my PD is 10/18/2004, EB3 China. Without H.R.3012, I would wait about 3-4 more months to become current. According to your prediction above, I would be current right away if H.R.3012 is passed? Please confirm when you get a chance.
Thanks again
Whole point about posting this article was to give individuals feel for the cut-off date movement so that they can make an informed decision to advocate wisely in favor or against the bill.
That said, I still think bill has long way to go. It still has not made it to the House calendar. In terms of steps it has just crossed limited hurdles; no one have even started debating about it. Once that will began, number of amendments or conditions could be added to this in Senate and this would have to go back and forth in Senate/House several times before it is approved or dropped.
Thank you very much.
Now let us take it in another perspective. Do you think the people in counter A and B (who are supposed to be the line for I and C) will agree that those people from the other counter will be ahead of them?
Let us assume customer Xand Y are in counter E (. That counter was closed and they were told to moved to the front of the line in either counter A or B since they were about to be entertained by the cashier in counter E.
You are in counter A and is about to be entertained by the cashier but you were told to moved back to let customer X, Y and Z ahead. What will you feel?
In an actual grocery store it is really FIFO but that is PER COUNTER. You close some of the counter, what happens to the FIFO? Should the people in E fall behind or cut ahead of the line in A or B? It will be chaos dont you think?
How will bill HR3012 if it becomes a law affects the dependents (derivatives) with pending I-485 of the EB3 RM & P primary applicants with approved I-485? Do these dependents, say with priority dates at late 2004 to 2005 or early 2006, have to wait for their approval until the backlogged of EB3 India and China clear?
My PD is Jan 13, 2006 EB 3 ROW. It is very possible it could be current this coming VB. God wlling.
I have a question (sorry if had been already posted before). Once any PD is current , how long do we have to introduce the I-485, or status change, has to be the same very day is current or we have at least that month while that PD is current ?
Thanks in advance. Keep doing the good Job.
Thx
RT
In any case, Employment base category has no place for country limits.. best talent will get a job and get a greencard.
I agree that it does not solve all of the issue but I think, the congressman here is trying to keep it simple to avoid any controversies. It has to be one step at a time. You will know what i mean if you here the debates at house and senate...
- your CP of 15% is low. There are 130K waiting at Consular process on 2010.
Once priority dates are current and applied for GC what is the minimum to maximum time to get Gc in hand.
Thanks in advance.
For EB3-P itself there are 44000 CP cases pending. But since 2008-2009 (do not remember), PERM data contains even CP cases, so that numbers are already included and may not be high as 119K as we think. Good number can be anywhere from 15-30%. This is why I always warn that the movement needs to be re- caliberated for each year.
Although EB3-I cases has 55000 pending until 2007 and usually have no to 2% CP demand, but same assumption of 15% was also added for them. So in all everything may offset each other and numbers may fall into same ball park.
You mean the numbers of EB3 CP pending is from 15-30% of the number of EB3 pending in USCIS(through I-485) ?
Thanks
http://shusterman.com/registerednursesusimmigration.html
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/WaitingListItem.pdf
but unfortunately it is not breakdown into per year and months.
So I do not understand when you use 2% for when here there are 25K waiting.
Employment Preferences
Country Total
Philippines 47,013
India 25,172
China-mainland born 14,012
Korea, South 8,178
Mexico 4,872
All Others 31,372
Worldwide Total 130,619
Demand data released!!
http://us-non-immigrants.blogspot.com/2011/10/hr-3012-estimation-of-eb-category-cut.html#comments
http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html
Category India Most Other Countries
F1 1-Sep-2004 1-Sep-2004
FX 8-Feb-2009 8-Feb-2009
F2A 22-Mar-2009 22-Mar-2009
F2B 15-Aug-2003 15-Aug-2003
F3 8-Oct-2001 8-Oct-2001
F4 15-Jul-2000 15-Jul-2000
E1 CURRENT CURRENT
E2 15-Mar-2008 CURRENT
E3 1-Aug-2002 15-Jan-2006
EW 22-Jul-2002 1-Jan-2006
E4 CURRENT CURRENT
E4-Religious CURRENT
CURRENT
Please do not worry about apology. Lets move on. We are all in this together.
http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,1110-endelman.shtm
question regarding 85% limit: My understanding is that this 85% limit is applied to the number of unreserved VISAs of the year. According to the table above, your understanding is to apply this 85% limit to the total number of VISAs of the year including both reserved and unreserved. Please clarify.
i just want to know what country of origin are you from?
That is so ridiculus! How HR3012 discriminate against ROW? Will it take longer for EB2ROW get green card than EB2IC?
My PD is Nov 2010. When do you think my PD will become current if HR 3012 become law as of today
my PD is March 2006 EB3 ROW. Any chance to get current before Hr312 becomes law? I feel so close now, it would suck to get all the way back once again :(
Answer is NO. You cannot take those data from CP cases on their face value. How it works for India is that since this country is highly backlogged, many attorneys would file such cases as CP at I-140 level and then when dates will become current, they would try to convert CP to AOS. This is mainly done to deal with job loss during retrogression. So whole lot of these numbers are double counted. 2-5% has worked exceptionally for this country and I do not expect it to change. Apart from this Demand Data has captured all the cases until July 2007 and PERM data captures most of the CP cases post 2008.
(ii) CALCULATION OF NUMBER- The numbers of visas calculated under this clause for a fiscal year is the number that is equal to 85 percent of the total number of immigrant visas made available under such section 203(b) for such fiscal year.
If there are a total of only 24,621 EB2 cases pending and the yearly allotment of EB2's is 40,000 (both numbers are derived from the stats from the article), why would there be a back log in that category (EB2) and why would there be no spill over to EB3? I will appreciate your replies. Thankyou.
To: FOREIGN AND NATIONAL EDITORS
Contact: CONTACT: Dan Wilson, Shirley & Banister Public Affairs, +1-703-739-5920/+1-703-297-9512, dwilson@sbpublicaffairs.com
Calls on President Obama to Get Involved in the Discussion
WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, a leading voice of Latino conservatives, commended U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) for introducing today the American Growth, Recovery, Empowerment and Entrepreneurship Act. The AGREE Act stems from areas of common agreement between the President's jobs plan, recommendations from the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, and plans put forward by both parties in Congress and includes a provision which eliminates per country caps on employment based immigrant visas and increases the per country cap for family-based immigrant visas from seven to fifteen percent. This same provision is included in H.R. 3012, the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, which was passed unanimously by the House Judiciary Committee recently. H.R. 3012 was introduced by Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and is co-sponsored by, among others, House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-IL).
"The impact of the AGREE Act immigration provision is quite significant. It will go a long way to reduce the enormous immigrant visa backlog that exists for workers from countries like India and China," said Alfonso Aguilar, Executive Director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles. "This is good news for high-tech American companies who currently have a very hard time recruiting and hiring professionals with advanced degrees from abroad simply because there are no visas available.
"H.R. 3012 will also shorten the wait for immigrant visas for people from countries like Mexico and the Philippines who want to come to the U.S. to be reunited with their families. Under the current per country limits, individuals from certain countries have to wait excessive - and sometimes unrealistic - periods of time for a family-based immigrant visa to become available."
I see the no.of co-sponsors are relatively low for this bill......Will it increase the delay time to pass/introduce, it in senate/house
More questions:
- Would you please post a link, which contains "85 percent of the total number of immigrant visas under Section 203(b)", which is 85% of 40000” cited above?
-Each year 2 countries, A & B share unreserved VISAs. If 85% limit is of 40000, then it's possible for the entire year all unreserved (which is also 85% of 40000 for example) VISAs go to a country A. It means, country B would not even get a single VISA that year? It doesn't make any sense to me if the bill is to help both country A & B.
- According to the link you provided http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h112-3012 “(ii) CALCULATION OF NUMBER- The numbers of visas calculated under this clause for a fiscal year is the number that is equal to 70 percent of the total number of immigrant visas made available under such section 203(b) for such fiscal year.” It seems that out of unreserved VISAs, 70% of 40000 is the limit? This makes more sense. As there is 15% of 40000 for Country B to catch up. BTW, the 70 percent is applied to 40000 or 140000?
- Where can I find text of H.R.3012 with latest amendment?
(is this one latest and official? http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/10272011%20Lofgren%20Amdt3%20-%20PASSED%20by%20voice.pdf
85% limit for a single country is kinda fuzzy to me. It seems that it’s applied to unreserved VISAs?)
Thanks again. I’ve see many articles regarding this bill on the Internet. Your site is the only one providing possible allocation of coming years and predictions if the bill gets passed. It would be very helpful, if there is estimation for how many VISAs for EB2, EB3 that Country A & B could get in FY 2012 after the bill passed.
Also, after this bill passed Country A & B will have shared PD in VB or different? How about all other countries? Each country got its own PD?
As you can see, I am quite confused. Hopefully you can help me understand this complicated bill.
Stand with the US citizens dear senators represtntatives.US citizens OPPOSE this Bill..this Bill will infiltrate americans with more Indians and they will trash ur jobs..and we American citizens will end up collecting unemployment check rest of our life because of THESE CHEAP VISA FOLKS FROM INDIA AND CHINA.stand with them aganist US citizens exploitation by the Indian and americans companies here in our home...Our Citizens with hefty student loans are out of work..our younger genration are starving because there parents don't have jobs...Our veterans are out of JOB...At the sametime companies hire VISA HOLDERS FOR work in our country...Indian and American companies..Do u know how many visa holders are working in our country in H1, L1 and EAD..there are 6 Million of these folks 95% from India and China..Do you know Indians companies in USA employ 1 Million Visa Holders mainly from INDIA..99% of these companies employ Visa Holders..they don't hire a single American...Fight for that people..Stop the discrimination against American Citizens..ALL Indian companies in USA hire only Indians or VISA holders..they just don;t hire an america..Take any example of Indian and American consulting BIG and small companies..Top 10 INDIAN IT and consulting companies employ more than 2 MILLION VISA holders in USA in H1, L1 B1 EAD and they have less 100 employees as US citizens..same case for American companies...where WE GO ..FIGHT FOR THAT CAUSE PEOPLE..SEND THESE VISA HOLDERS HOME..CANCEL THERE work permit..we will prosper again..fight for the real cause OCCUPY WALLSTREET FOLKS..Fight against these injustice people..Fight to Increase THERE VISA FEES TO 30k/year SO COMAPNIES CANNOT BRING IN CHEAP WORKERS BUT ONLY BRIGHT AND BEST CANDIDATES TO WORK HERE BY PAYING THE premium..We need people from across the world..across different race..Talent is everywhere in the world..But the scenario is perosn in Germany, France, Africa and Australia wants to come and work here cannot do that because for the last 10 years 95% of all Workd Visa listed above is taken over by Indians and Chinease..In 2011 even though our presideNt INCREASED THE VISA FEES TO $2000 , 82000 OUT OF 85000 IS FILLED BY NOW WHEN AN AVERGAE AMERICA CITIZENS IS HAVING DIFFICULTY IN MEETING ENDS MEET..stop this injustice..Cancell all these work visa's or increase there yearly fees to 30,000/ANnum so that corporates should be just replace an american worker with a CHEAP OVERSEAS WORKER
I wonder what will happen if this bill becomes a law. My PD is Feb 2008 in Eb3.
When should I expect my PD to be close to current?
Thank you
Cheers
I fall under ROW and my PD is 28 April 2006. Do you think i will get my GC before this HR3012 will be in law ?
Thanks for your advice.
SP
as per this, Country A can only receive 85% of Unreserved visas (and not 40,000 which is as per INA Section 203 (b), that was initially stated in original bill draft).
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/C...
Paragraph (2) of subsection (e) sets out rules for the distribution
of the reserved and unreserved visas set under paragraph (1):
• Reserved Visas: Natives of no single country can take more than 25% of the reserved visas.
• Unreserved Visas: Natives of no single country can take more than 85% of the unreserved visas, ensuring that the second largest user of such visas can receive at least 15% of the unreserved visas.
P.S. - That said in any case above projections does not change as previously mentioned. At not point any country was using more than 28K visas in above calculations when considering FIFO model. It looks like number 70% or 85% was crafted carefully keeping numbers in mind :).
http://majorityleader.gov/floor/weekly.html
As a result, if this bill is passed then China EB2/3 will definitely go faster than current pase. For China EB3, VB date will still be between India's and ROW's but with more VISAs allocated comparing to current number without this bill's help.
I would recommend getting out of your house once in a while and picking up a news papaer to understand what is going on in the real world.
1. How long do you think will it take for this bill to become a law at the earliest?
2. My priority date is 9/16/03 EB3Ind. I don't have a date finalized yet but I will be getting married sometime in 3/12 or 4/12. Do you think I have that much time, before my AOS gets approved (if this bill becomes a law). How many months reasonably do you think I have before my AOS will get approved (if HR 3012) passes.
Thanks for all the hard work you are doing in keeping all of us more aware & informed.
Far from fair!!! Everybody knew the wait times before they started, no changing rules in the middle of the game!! I strongly oppose a bill that favors only 2 countries (India and China) and forgets about other hard working skilled workers from the rest of the world whi have been in line too (EB3 world wide workers wait 6+ years). Oppose this unfair bill
Can you please explain what this means and what are the next steps.
http://maplight.org/us-congress/bill/112-hr-3012/1013214/total-contributions
If you want this bill to pass with flying color in Senate please do not hesitate to contribute to interested group supporting the cause.